The Philippine Catholic Church is a rich religious organization

The picture of Manila Cathedral

SOURCE: http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/insideOpinion.htm?f=2011%2Fmay%2F28%2Felizabethangsioco.isx&d=2011%2Fmay%2F28

This is something that only few of us know: the Philippine Roman Catholic Church is a multi-billionaire religious and business organization. Yes, the Church is mega-rich.

We have always known that the Church, to which at least 80 per cent of Filipinos belong, is rich. Its properties like cathedrals and other big churches, expensive private Catholic colleges and universities all over the country, private hospitals, big buildings and huge tracts of land for their seminaries, etc. are there for people to see. We have always thought this as a given, normal. After all, the Church has been here longer than any of us.

No one really cared to approximate how rich the bishops really are and what the church can do if it really wanted to help poor Catholics.

We know that Catholic schools are the most expensive that only children of the rich can attend. And, yes, Catholic schools are among the best in the country. In effect, children belonging to rich families generally receive better quality education than those of poor Catholic families.

We also know that Catholic hospitals are good. Though they are not the most expensive, still, these are private hospitals that ordinary Catholics can hardly afford. Thus, these hospitals care more for those who are better off than the millions mired in poverty.

Quality education and healthcare are two of the most urgent needs of the people, and we are, as the Church claims, mostly Catholic. Yet, we never question why the Church mostly serves those who are, in the first place, able to fend for themselves.

On top of these properties and service-oriented institutions that earn by themselves are the business holdings of the various Catholic organizations in the country’s biggest business corporations. This, I think, is something that people do not know about. After all, churches are not expected to be business corporations at the same time.

Very recently, news organizations have bannered Catholic Church holdings in at least two big corporations —Philex Mining Corporation and the Bank of the Philippine Islands.
Chamber of Mines head Jerry Brimo said that as of March 31, Catholic entities owned a substantial number of shares in Philex. The Archbishop of Manila owned 3,221,135 shares; the Religious of the Virgin Mary-B with a total of 4,216,804 shares; and the Archbishop in Zamboanga owned 1,116,147 shares.

According to the Philippine Stock Exchange, as of 27 May 2011, each Philex share is valued at P20.45. This means that the Catholic Church’s holdings in the company are valued at P65,872,210.75; P86,233,641.80; and P22,825,206.15 respectively, or a total of P174,931,058.70.

In BPI’s list of its top 100 stockholders as of 31 March 2011, at least eleven were obviously Catholic entities. The worth of these stocks amounts to many billions of pesos (computed at P57.05 per share according to the 27 May PSE Market Information). These were (according to ranking and number of stocks owned):

• 4 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila with 222,843,681 shares worth P12,713,232,001;

• 8 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila (Real Casa de Misericordia) with 41,408,841 shares worth P2,362,374,379;

• 13 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila (Hospital de San Juan de Dios) with 22,072,182 shares worth P1,259,217,983;

• 15 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila (Hospicio de San Jose) with 6,016,624 shares worth P343,248,399;

• 17 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila (Hosp de San Juan de Dios) with 4,285,572 shares worth P244,491,882;
• 21 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila (Mayordomia dela Catedral) with 2,664,266 shares worth P151,996,375;

• 26 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila (St. Paul’s Hospital) with 1,772,418 shares worth P101,116,447;

• 49 Carmel of the Divine Infant Jesus of Prague, Inc (Filipino) with 726,819 shares worth P41,465,024;

• 60 Superior dela Corporacion Filipina de Padres Agustinos Recoletos, Inc. with 551,382 shares worth P31,456,343;

• 64 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Jaro with 491,385 shares worth P28,033,514; and
• 74 Corporacion de Padres Dominicos with 380,307 shares worth P21,696,514.

The staggering amount of RCC money in BPI alone totals P17.3 billion pesos. Add its Philex holdings and the total is 17.5 BILLION PESOS. This huge amount in only two corporations! It will not be surprising if the Catholic Church has a lot more money in other big corporations.

With this alone, the Roman Catholic Church already becomes the 9th richest in the country dislodging Emilio Yap, Manila Hotel and Manila Bulletin owner and Oscar Lopez of Benpres Holdings Corporation.
Let’s imagine what this kind of money can do.

P17.5 billion pesos is more than half of the total budget of the Department of Health which is P31.8 billion. The department’s budget is supposed to serve more than 90 million Filipinos. We can only guess how many hospitals can be better equipped, how many doctors and nurses can be hired, and eventually, how many lives can be saved if only the Church decides to put this money in people’s health —even only in Catholic people’s health.

The National Statistical Coordination Board estimates that there are about four million families living in poverty and each needs P7,017.00 monthly to stay out of poverty. Instantly, the Catholic church is in a very good position to remove about 2.5 million families from poverty!

The Church positions itself as the vanguard of morality. Yet, while it sits on at least P17.5 billion, it continues to solicit donations from the poor instead of helping them have a better life. The Church proclaims itself as the protector of life. Yet it doesn’t use its billions to save the Catholic poor from hunger, sickness, and death.

Why don’t we see anything wrong with the bishop in all his finery standing beside the Catholic beggar? Is it really acceptable that cathedrals are in the same community of Catholic slum dwellers?
When will the Roman Catholic Church realize that as the multi-billionaire church of the millions of poor Filipino Catholics, it is its moral responsibility to substantially help its flock?

eangsioco@yahoo.com

INC members beat Pentecostal preachers

 

THE COLORS OF IGLESIA NI CRISTO RELIGION OF FELIX MANALO FOUNDED IN 1914

CLICK THIS LINK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVXclG4Zsrk&feature=related

Mohammad, Allah's Apostle ordered to kill Jewish war losers

It is very clear that It was recorded to present history the annihilation attempt against the Jews like this:

After the Suez War, tension and low-intensity conflict continued, including terror attacks, with sporadic violence with Syria over diversion of water supplies. Internal problems in Egypt led Nasser to divert the attention of his population, and his formation of a united military command with Jordan and Syria increased Israeli concerns. In 1967, Nasser suddenly ordered the departure of UN peacekeeping troops in the Sinai (immediately implemented by the secretary-general), adding speeches threatening to "push the Jews into the sea."

SOURCE: http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&TMID=111&LNGID=1&FID=283&PID=0&IID=2206

Until now, this is the doctrine of the Muslims surrounding the State of Israel.

Philippine Catholic Church condemns mining but owns shares in Philex

SOURCE: http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/insideNews.htm?f=2011/may/24/news1.isx&d=2011/may/24

Church condemns mining but owns shares in Philex

by Rey T. Salita

THE Chamber of Mines on Monday slammed the Catholic Church for condemning all mining activities in Palawan when some of its members own shares in a mining firm.

Chamber head Jerry Brimo produced before a breakfast forum in Makati a report of Philex Mining Corp. listing the shares in the company owned by the Archbishop of Manila, the Religious of the Virgin-B, and the Archbishop of Zamboanga.

The report for the quarter to March 31, 2011, listed the Archbishop of Manila as owning 3,221,135 shares in the copper and gold mining firm, the Religious of the Virgin-B with 3,125,777 shares plus another 1,091,027, and the Archbishop in Zamboanga with 1,116,147 shares.

“How can the Catholic Church give its moral backing to environmental advocates in Palawan protesting against mining in general?” said Brimo, head of Nickel Asia Corp. in the province.

is this another hypocrisy?

you the one to judge.

Quran verses that teaches hate to both Jews and Christians

As you will see from the following quotes, the Quran does have the effect, if not the design, of promoting disparagement of Jews and Christians. The quotes are from the English version of the Quran and although some content may have been lost in translation, the main ideas of the verses are clear. Upon reading these verses, three things should become clear. That The Quran shows clear animosity toward Jews and Christians.

That the verses are written in an argumentative style that is more typical of a
person than of God. That the overall style and certain references do not conform to the biblical text that (supposedly) contain the roots of Islam. See (5:44). Surly these issues are subjective, however we must consider what the majority of people would consider reasonable.
  
82:62 Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish
(scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.  

This is nice sentiment, however it will be repeatedly contradicted in later text.
Shortly after this was written Muhammad's army slaughtered hundreds of Jews and sold their women and children into slavery when they took the city of Medina.
  
2:111 And they say: "None shall enter Paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian." Those are their (vain) desires. Say: "Produce your proof if ye are truthful."
  
 Who said that and where is it written? If this refers to a quote from Torah it is
God's words and not that of the Jewish people.The fact is the Torah and Talmud says no such concept. Judaism teaches ANYONE can bring the presence of God upon themselves;you don't have to be Jewish.Talmud: 

Tosefta,Saheddrin 13: The righteous of all nations have a share in the World to Come.Zohar: Tana DeBei Eliahu Rabbah 9: I call heaven and earth as witnesses:Any individual,whether gentile or Jew,man or woman,servant or maid,can bring the Divine Presence upon himself in accordance to his deeds.

The language and communication style used in this verse as in all of these verses, is noticibly different from that in both the Torah and in the New Testament. At any rate the verse has a malicious tone that disparages other religions.
  
2:113 The Jews say: "The Christians have naught (to stand) upon; and the
Christians say: "The Jews have naught (To stand) upon." Yet they (Profess to) study the(same) Book. Like unto their word is what those say who know not; but Allah will judge between them in their quarrel on the Day of Judgment. 

Again the communication style differs from that which we are used to, and again
we see language that appears to be intended to discredit Jews and Christians. The main issue here is that Jews and Christians do not in fact profess to study the same book. Certainly God would know this, Muhammad on the other hand, evidently did not. This discrepancy suggests that it was in fact Muhammad that wrote the Quran.

2:120 Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou
follow their form of religion. Say: "The Guidance of Allah,-that is the (only) Guidance."
Wert thou to follow their desires after the knowledge which hath reached thee, then
wouldst thou find neither Protector nor helper against Allah. 

Consider the point of view of the author, although written in the third person it
seems as though the author is obsessed with deliberation with the Jewish and Christian people. This verse seems to reflect emotions that are more typical of a man than of God. Also as I have shown above,Judaism teaches no such thing
  
2:135 They say: "Become Jews or Christians if ye would be guided (To
salvation)." Say thou: "Nay! (I would rather) the Religion of Abraham the True, and he
joined not gods with Allah."
  
 Who says this? Certainly, if this text was written by God he would remember
commanding that the Jews make no attempt to covert non-Jews.
   
2:140 Or do ye say that Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes were Jews or Christians? Say: Do ye know better than Allah. Ah! who is more unjust than those who conceal the testimony they have from Allah. but Allah is not unmindful of what ye do! 

This verse like those before it is written in an argumentative style that would be
unlikely of God. It also contains the direct accusation that Jews and Christians are
unjust.

4:46 Of the Jews there are those who displace words from their (right) places, and say: "We hear and we disobey"; and "Hear what is not Heard"; and "Ra'ina"; with a twist of their tongues and a slander to Faith. If only they had said: "What hear and we obey"; and "Do hear"; and "Do look at us"; it would have been better for them, and more proper; but Allah hath cursed them for their Unbelief; and but few of them will believe. 

 
The debasement of the Jews continues in this verse with a supposed statement by God that he has cursed the entire religion. Is this not in direct conflict with verse 82:62? Also the Quran says Isa (Jesus) came to confirm the Torah,the same one used today, so how is it changed? In fact,the Quran has been changed,but I will get to that later.

4:160 For the iniquity of the Jews We made unlawful for them certain (foods)
good and wholesome which had been lawful for them;- in that they hindered many from Allah's Way; 

 
I assume this verse refers to the Kosher restrictions. If this is the case, the author clearly does not understand the nature of the Kosher restrictions. A good question that comes to mind is, why would God punish the Jews with restrictions if the Jews typically disobey such commandments? ("We hear and we disobey ,4:46).
  
2:120 Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou
follow their form of religion. Say: "The Guidance of Allah,-that is the (only) Guidance."
Wert thou to follow their desires after the knowledge which hath reached thee, then
wouldst thou find neither Protector nor helper against Allah.
  
5:18 (Both) the Jews and the Christians say: "We are sons of Allah, and his
beloved." Say: "Why then doth He punish you for your sins? Nay, ye are but men,- of the men he hath created: He forgiveth whom He pleaseth, and He punisheth whom He pleaseth: and to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between: and unto Him is the final goal (of all)" 

Here the point made by the author possesses no obvious flaws. What is apparent here as in most of the verses, is the anti-Jew, anti-Christian theme. The style also suggests that the sentiments are the words of a personally involved party and not of the King of kings.
  
5:41 O Messenger. let not those grieve thee, who race each other into unbelief:
(whether it be) among those who say "We believe" with their lips but whose hearts have no faith; or it be among the Jews,- men who will listen to any lie,- will listen even to others who have never so much as come to thee. They change the words from their (right) times and places: they say, "If ye are given this, take it, but if not, beware!" If any one's trial is intended by Allah, thou hast no authority in the least for him against Allah. For such - it is not Allah.s will to purify their hearts. For them there is disgrace in this world, and in the Hereafter a heavy punishment.
 

Here we see another clear attempt to slander the Jewish people. Had this been an article published in a newspaper it would surly be condemned as an anti-Semitic assault. If we expect more than this from men, how much more could we expect from God.
   
5:44 It was We who revealed the law (to Moses): therein was guidance
and light. By its standard have been judged the Jews, by the prophets who bowed (as in Islam) to Allah's will, by the rabbis and the doctors of law: for to them was entrusted the protection of Allah's book, and they were witnesses thereto: therefore fear not men, but fear me, and sell not my signs for a miserable price. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) Unbelievers. 

 
The Quran was written around 600 AD, yet in this verse we see the attempt by
Islam to make the retroactive claim that Jewish history was in fact Islamic history
incognito. I assume the Muslims have an elaborate explanation as to why it took
thousands of years to get things straightened out. It is important to note however, that Muhammad's people stood to gain a great deal from such a claim. There is also a sub claim here, Islam refers to Torah as "Gods book" this suggests that Torah is in fact a bench mark for discussion of Islam. Therefore, it would be an inconsistency to refute it's teachings.Yet the previous verse mentions it was changed.This makes little sence. This is done in Quran both directly and accidentally. (2:111 And they say: "None shall enter Paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian." Those are their (vain)desires. Say: "Produce your proof if ye are truthful.").

In verse 5:44 the author shifts from criticism of Jews to pro active Judgment of
the Jews (by Muslims),( If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) Unbelievers.).

5:51 O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and
protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust. 

 
I probably don't need to point out the defamation of the Jewish and Christian
people in verse 5:51, and it should be clear to the plainest of logic that this verse was written by a man with a great deal of animosity toward these people.

5:64 The Jews say: "(Allah)'s hand is tied up." Be their hands tied up and be they accursed for the (blasphemy) they utter. Nay, both His hands are widely outstretched: He giveth and spendeth (of His bounty) as He pleaseth. But the revelation that cometh to thee from Allah increaseth in most of them their obstinate rebellion and blasphemy. Amongst them we have placed enmity and hatred till the Day of Judgment. Every time they kindle the fire of war, Allah doth extinguish it; but they (ever) strive to do mischief on earth. And Allah loveth not those who do mischief.
  
Here the vilification of the Jews grows more intense with the assertion that God's
chosen people are now hated by God. Once again the author reveals his personal
involvement with his hostility toward the Jews for rejecting the Quran. One thing that is important to note here is that when Torah speaks of people falling out of grace with God it is referring to small, limited groups of people such as those in Sodom and Gomorrah. Those people were dispatched, and the story ended leaving only history. In contrast, the Quran's affront of Jews and Christians has the very different effect of ongoing malice toward a living race of people. This is unacceptable by today's standards, and is simply not the way of God. 

But the revelation that cometh to thee from Allah increaseth in most of them their
obstinate rebellion and blasphemy.
 

This statement was supposedly written before the Jews had knowledge of it, how
then could they have rejected it? This is like saying, "I would have sent cash but I
already sealed the envelope". Perhaps God was foretelling the future, like when he said he would harden Pharaohs heart? If that is the case, one must ask why God had confidence in the Jewish people for so long only to pre-condemn them this time?

5:69 Those who believe (in the Qur'an), those who follow the Jewish (scriptures),
and the Sabians and the Christians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness,- on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. 

How can any reasonable person expect that this would be possible given the
damaging statements made in other verses?

5:82 Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews and
Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou find those who say, "We are Christians": because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant.

It appears as though the author has changed his mind about the Christians for the time being.

6:146 For those who followed the Jewish Law, We forbade every (animal) with
undivided hoof, and We forbade them that fat of the ox and the sheep, except what
adheres to their backs or their entrails, or is mixed up with a bone: this in recompense for their wilful disobedience: for We are true (in Our ordinances). 

This is an obvious misunderstanding of the Kosher restrictions. It is not likely
that God would make such a grievous error. Perhaps the use of the term we ( first
person) refers to Muslims, of which the author is one. If this is the case than it would seem to imply that the Quran is expressing the views of Muhammad, and not of God. Some may argue that the term "we" was used because God is a Muslim. This idea would not make sense given that the term "Muslim" means "one who submits to God." Similarly it would imply that the Muslims are God's peers. This would go against the most fundamental tenants of Islam. 

9:30 The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of
Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! 

The author of this verse clearly has no knowledge of Judaism. I say this because, as every Jew knows the idea that God would have a son is an absurdity to Judaism.

16:118 To the Jews We prohibited such things as We have mentioned to thee
before: We did them no wrong, but they were used to doing wrong to themselves. 

I assume the repeated use of the word "we" is a slip by Muhammad . At any rate the simplicity of the logic here speaks for itself. 

22:17 Those who believe (in the Qur'an), those who follow the Jewish
(scriptures), and the Sabians, Christians, Magians, and Polytheists,- Allah will judge
between them on the Day of Judgment: for Allah is witness of all things. 

The use of the phrase "judge between them" reinforces my assertion that these
verses are written in an argumentative format more typical of a human author than of
God.

These issues are subject to each persons individual interpretation of what is likely and what is reasonable. What is clear, is that the Quran does contain defamatory remarks toward Jews and Christians, and that the writing style of the Quran differs from both the Old and New Testament. Also clear is that the style of these verses is argumentative and seem to focus on a dispute between men. Of particular significance, is the fact that historical accounts of the time period suggest that Muhammad did in fact, have political reasons that parallel the opinions expressed in the Quran. Does this seem to be an incredible coincidence? Another issue, is the abundance of staked evidence. Of the twenty quotes found regarding Judaism, only two spoke well of other religions and they did so in a precursory manner. As mentioned previously each person must draw his or her own conclusions. As for myself, I am reasonably certain that God would not speak
that way of his chosen people.

The original Quran is changed

Nineteen years after the death of Mohammed,during the re-arrangement process, a commitee of scribes was appointed to make several copies of the Quran to be dispatched to new Islamic lands.The copies were to be made from he original Quran written by Mohammed.

The commitee was overseen by Ali Ibn Abi Taaleb,Uthman Ibn "Affaan,Zeid Ibn Thaabet,Ubayy Ibn Ka'ab,Abdullah Ibn Al-Zubair,Sa'eed IbnAl-Aas,and Abdul Rahman Ibn Al-HaarethIbn Heshaam. 

When the scribes reached Sura 9, the scribes who idolized Mohammed added two verses at the end of Sura 9 to honor Mohammed by a majority agreement. Ali Ibn Abi Taaleb was outraged that they changed the text of the Quran.His protest is documented in many references, the most well know is the classic AL ITQAAN FEE 'ULUM AL QURAN.

Uthman was assassinated and Ali was installed as the 4th Khalifa.The result was a 50 year war between Ali Ibn Abi Taaleb and his supporters on one side and the ones who added the verses on the other. Ali was martyred,and eventually his family,Mohammed's family, except for some women and children,were killed.The war ended when Hussein ibn Ali and his family were maretyred in Karbala and the distorters of the Quran won the war,leaving muslims without the actual original worded Quran for the last almost 1400 years.

The Umayyad ruler Marwan Ibn Al-Hakam (died 684 CE) destroyed the original Quran that was written by Mohammed,"fearing the eruption of new disputes". So,in fact,the Quran is changed and still is changed.

Islam discriminates the Blacks

Muslims claim that Islam looks at all people as being the same,yet besides the verses in the Quran that deride Jews and Christians, they also have other books that deride Blacks.

Mohammed referred to Blacks as raisin heads. (Sahih Al Bukhary vol 1, no 662 and vol 9, no 256).

In another Hadith, Mohammed is quoted as saying that Blacks are pugnosed slaves (Sahih Moslem vol 9 pages 46 and 47)

It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah’s army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent.

 

Ishaq 450

The most hateful among the creation of Allah us one black man among them (Khwarij). One of his hand is like the teat of a goat or the nipple of the breast.

Sahih Muslim 5:2334

Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed.

Ibn Musa al-Yahsubi, Qadi ‘Iyad, p.375

He prayed that the African's color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks."

Tabari II:11

"Therefore, the Negro nation are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because [Negroes] have little [that is essentially] human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated."

Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah, 14th century

"[Blacks] are ugly and misshapen, because they live in a hot country."

Ibn Qutaybah (828-889)

 

Makes you wonder why so many blacks convert to Islam.

Quran actually supports the Zionist cause

 
Muslim critics of Israel often say that Jerusalem's holy sites must be
transferred to Muslim control, because of the central role they play in
Islamic theology. For instance, the Dome of the Rock was built on the site
where Mohammed is believed to have ascended to Heaven to receive the
revelation of the Qur'an.

However, these people seldom actually quote the Qur'an itself. This is
probably because, amazing as it sounds, the Qur'an actually supports the
Zionist cause.

Specifically, Mohammed in Sura 5:21 quotes Moses telling the Jews to "enter
into the holy land which Allah has assigned to you". While Mohammed later
criticizes the Jews for their sins and their refusal to accept Mohammed's
message, he never says that, as punishment, Allah has revoked their title to
the land. Hence the title still stands, and Muslim anti-Zionists are
apostates.

Indeed, this is the opinion of Sheikh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi, co-chairman
of the Islam-Israel Fellowship, who condemns the Palestinian uprising as
"fitnah" (sedition), which is forbidden in Islam as long as the Muslims are
granted religious freedom.

A case could even be made that Israel's victory over the Arabs in the 1948
war was a judgement by Allah against the Arabs for their apostasy in opposing
the Zionists.

This would be their just reward for transgressing Sura 2:190, which says,
"Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not
hostilities."

Moreover, Sura 60:9 forbids aiding the enemies of the Muslim people. Contrast
this with the Palestinians' continued support of Saddam Hussein, whose hands
are red with the blood of Iranian, Kurdish, and Kuwaiti Muslims.

The Jews' return from 19 centuries of exile is actually the fulfillment of
Islamic prophecy. Sura 17:104 says that "when the promise of the Hereafter
comes to pass, We [Allah] shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various
nations".

Sura 17:4 says, "And We [Allah] gave (clear) warning to the children of
Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be
elated with mighty arrogance (and twice would they be punished)!"  


The succeeding verses tell us that the punishment referred to was banishment from
the land. But "twice" means twice, not three times; hence the Jews, having
been banished from the land once by the Babylonians and a second time by
Rome, will never again be banished from the land. According to the Qur'an,
Israel is an eternal nation.

Moreover, "twice would they do mischief on the earth" means twice, not three
times; hence the Jews will never again do mischief on the earth. In
particular, the Jews cannot bear moral responsibility for the Palestinian
refugee problem.

Sura 83:1 says, "Woe to those that deal in fraud"; yet Yasir Arafat reneged
on his promise to guard Joseph's Tomb in Nablus after the Israeli troops
withdrew.

The Palestinians deny that there ever was a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. But
Sura 17:7 records the destruction of the First Temple by Babylon and the
Second Temple by Rome, and Mohammed never contests the Bible's claim that the
Temples were in Jerusalem.

Sura 16:126 says, "If ye punish, then punish with the like of that wherewith
ye were afflicted." Yet Ariel Sharon's nonviolent, if provocative, visit to
the Temple Mount was met with rioting, including the use of firebombs and
AK-47's.

The Palestinians are hypocrites. "Allah akhbar!", they chant; "G-d is great!"
Yet they flagrantly transgress their own cherished Scriptures. Is it any
wonder that they have allied themselves over the years with such villains as
Adolf Hitler, Yosef Stalin, and Saddam Hussein?

Quran references to the land of Israel:

Sura5:19-22 references:

People of the Book!

"Bear in mind the words of Moses to his people.He said,"Remember,my people,the favour which G-d has bestowed upon you.He raised up prophets from among you,made you kings, and given to you that which He has given no other nation.Enter,my people,the holy land which G-d has assigned for you

Sura 10:93
We settled the Israelites in a blessed land and provided them with good things.

Sura17:103
Then We said to the Israelites,"Dwell in this land.When the promise of the hearafter comes to be fulfilled,We shall assemble you all together."

An interesting note is the fact Muslims deride the Talmudic writings as "rabbinic garbage".Please take note that these Talmudic verses not only predate Mohammed,they predate Isa (Jesus)

Tosefta,Saheddrin 13:The righteous of all nations have a share in the World to Come.
Tana DeBei Eliahu Rabbah 9: I call heaven and earth as witnesses:Any individual,whether gentile or Jew,man or woman,servant or maid,can bring the Divine Presence upon himself in accordance to his deeds.

compared to

 
Sura 82:62 Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish
(scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.

Sanhedrin 37b:

Whover kills a single soul,scripture ascribes to him that he has killed a complete world
Sanhedrin 37a:And whoever saves a single soul,scripture ascribes to him as though he saved an entire world

Compared to

 
Sura5:33 On account of this,We prescribed to the Children of Israel that whoever killed a person-unless it be for killing a person or for creating disorder in the land-it shall be as if he killed all mankind;and whoso gave life to one,it shall be as if he gave life to all mankind.

The shocking video that Muslims should not see this (Nazi and Palestinians are the same)

Islamic way of educating Muslim children

Effects of Overpopulation. The reason why Phil. RH bill should be passed into a law

Someone was excommunicated in ADD who is unworthy to deserve it?

Look at this statement made by an ADD member  (CLICK TO SEE THE IMAGE LARGER):

Take note, this ADD member heard this thing right away during their Thanksgiving.

hmmm, This could be the worst thing I heard inside ADD religion presided by Bro. Eli Soriano.

I dont know what are the reasons for this even the member itself who said it based on the statement above.

you know what could be the reason for this?

http://www.thebereans.net/forum2/showpost.php?p=774869&postcount=56

tungkol naman doon sa nasabi kong natiwalag, maski natiwalag pero nagbago at nagpatuloy sa pagdalo at nireview muli kung papaano siya natiwalag at ang buhay na ikinabubuhay niya sa kasalukuyan, naibalik siya muli ayon sa pahayag ni Soriano.

In English:

About what I said on the excommunicated, even an excommunicated but he changed and continues to attend and It was reviewed how he was excommunicated and the life he lives in the present.


He was returned again according to Soriano's statement.

This statement was said by a former ADD member named Teng of the thebereans.net 

Who should be blamed for it? if an ADD member was unrightfully excommunicated but with God's mercy is he was returned when his case was reviewed and found out that he is unworthy to be excommunicated in ADD religion?

P.S. Answer this question, my future ADD readers! 

Proof that Catholic Defenders anti RH bill are losing the debate

From: http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2011/05/16/in-response-to-takedown-demands-by-defensores-fidei/

What follows is our editorial staff’s response to a letter sent to us from the Chairman of the Defensores Fidei Foundation demanding that we take down our video recordings of their public event ‘Women Speak Out: The Medical And Legal Truths About The RH Bill’.

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your letter and its accompanying concern. Kindly allow us to note however that your organization’s event was advertised as free and open to the public. We attended it openly, identifying ourselves as being from the Filipino Freethinkers through our tshirts before the event, giving our names and organization during the open forum segment, and later in conversations with other attendees and the lecturers themselves after the event. We went intending to listen to other people’s opinions and evaluate information that your lecturers presented as factual during both their presentations and as indicated in the title of the event itself. During the event we were recording openly and in full view, along with several others in attendance.

Our members conducted themselves in this manner not for profit but in the interest of providing the public with information. Given freedom of the press and mass media to disseminate matters of public concern, of which the Reproductive Health Bill is surely one, it is our belief that we are not violating the law but are in fact doing a service to the Filipino people by duly providing them with information on both sides of the current RH controversy.

It is for these reasons that after having given due consideration to your concerns and consulting with our legal team, we are respectfully refusing to give in to your demands.

Allow us here to reiterate our ongoing stance that there remains a need to continue a respectful and fact-based discussion on the RH Bill. We at Filipino Freethinkers believe that keeping an open, honest discussion on RH and other matters of public policy benefits both sides.

We therefore wish to ask your good organization to help all involved in public policy issues to arrive at, as you put it in the title of your event, the real ‘Truths’. We would like to ask that Defensores Fidei do its part to propagate discussion rather than end it by resorting to threats.

Sincerely,

Red Tani

President, Filipino Freethinkers

and

The Editorial Staff of filipinofreethinkers.org

Original Letter From Defensores Fidei:

Dear Sir,

It has been brought to our attention that  transcripts and videos of “Women Speak: Medical and Legal Truths about the RH Bill”, a symposium organized by Defensores Fidei and the Chapel of the Eucharistic Lord at SM Megamall on April 30, 2011, have been posted at the website of your organization (at http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2011/05/02/tastebuds-tsunamis-and-the-thorough-twisting-of-truth-a-recap-of-the-anti-rh-forum-at-sm-megamall-1-of-2-parts/ and related links) without the permission of the lecturers and the event organizers.

Please be reminded that according to Article 172 (c) of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, “lectures, sermons, addresses, dissertations prepared for oral delivery, whether or not reduced in writing or other material form” are works protected by copyright, and pursuant to Section 177 of the same Code, only the copyright holder has the right to carry out, authorize, or prevent the reproduction,  publication , or communication of the work to the public.  Anyone who would violate such rights would incur civil, administrative, and criminal liabilities.

Thus, formal demand is hereby made on your organization to remove the aforementioned transcripts and videos from your website, and to refrain from further unauthorized publication of the said materials on your website.  Should you fail to heed our just demand, our organization will be constrained to take the proper legal actions to protect our rights.

For your guidance.

Sincerely,

Gerry Castro

Chairman
Defensores Fidei Foundation

Apocrypha teachings contradict the Prophets' teachings

Apocrypha teachings VERSUS Prophet of God's teachings:

First, There is the account of a supposed high and good angel of God who lies and teaches the use of magic! In Tobit 5:4 we are told that the angel's name is "Raphael," but later he lies to Tobit, claiming to be "Azarias the son of the great Ananias, one of your relatives" (Tobit 5:12).

This angel professes to be "one of the seven holy angels who present the prayers of the saints and enter into the presence of the glory of the Holy One" (Tobit 12:15). Yet he not only lies about his name, but teaches magic. "Then the angel said to him, `Cut open the fish and take the heart and liver and gall and put them away safely.' ... Then the young man said to the angel, `Brother Azarias, of what use is the liver and heart and gall of the fish?' He replied, `As for the heart and the liver, if a demon or evil spirit gives trouble to any one, you make a smoke from these before the man or woman, and that person will never be troubled again. And as for the gall, anoint with it a man who has white films in his eyes, and he will be cured'" (Tobit 6:4,6-8).

The Bible clearly condemns magical practices such as this (consider Deuteronomy 18:10-12; Leviticus 19:26,31; Jeremiah 27:9; Malachi 3:5).

Second, The book of Judith contains the account of how a supposedly godly widow destroyed one of Nebuchadnezzar's generals through deceit and sexual offers. It is also important to note that Judith's counsel regarding resisting Nebuchadnezzar was contrary to that given by God's prophet Jeremiah (Jeremiah 38:1-4). God warned the Israelites to submit to Nebuchadnezzar rather than to resist, because the Babylonian captivity and destruction of Israel was a judgment from God upon the Jew's rebellion and idolatry.

Third, The Apocryphal books were rejected from the canon of Scripture by the early church leaders. "It is a significant fact that the best of the early Fathers adopted the Hebrew canon as giving the authoritative Scriptures of the O.T." (Analytical, p. 1083).

Fourth, Tobit taught that help is only to be given to the deserving. "Place your bread on the grave of the righteous, but give none to sinners" (Tobit 4:17). Contrariwise, in Exodus 23:4-5 God taught even in O.T. times that His people were to do good to their enemies and not only toward the righteous.

MORE PROOFS THAT IT IS NOT GOD INSPIRED:

A) Ecclesiasticus 25:24 From a woman sin had its beginning. Because of her we all die

Romans 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

B) Ecclesiasticus 22:3 It is a disgrace to be the father of an undisciplined, and the birth of a daughter is a loss.

Psalms 127:3 Lo, children [are] an heritage of the LORD: [and] the fruit of the womb [is his] reward.  


C) The false doctrine of salvation through works is taught in the book of Tobit. "For almsgiving delivers from death, and it will purge away every sin" (Tobit 12:9). "So now, my children, consider what almsgiving accomplishes and how righteousness delivers" (Tobit 14:11). These false teachings must be contrasted with Leviticus 17:11, which says "it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul," 

Another example:

Wisdom 8:19-20  For I was a witty child, and had a good spirit.  (20)  Yea rather, being good, I came into a body undefiled.

Romans 3:10  As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one;

Romans 5:18  Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men.

And, still another:

Sirach 3:3  Whoso honoureth his father maketh an atonement for his sins.

Sirach 3:30  Water will quench a flaming fire; and alms maketh an atonement for sins.

Leviticus 17:11  For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life.

One more:

Sirach 12:4-7   Give to the godly man, and help not a sinner.  (5)  Do well unto him that is lowly, but give not to the ungodly: hold back thy bread, and give it not unto him, lest he overmaster thee thereby: for else thou shalt receive twice as much evil for all the good thou shalt have done unto him.  (6)  For the most High hateth sinners, and will repay vengeance unto the ungodly, and keepeth them against the mighty day of their punishment.  (7)   Give unto the good, and help not the sinner.

Luke 6:27-28  “But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, (28)  bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.

Romans 12:18-20  If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.  (19)  Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord.  (20)  On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”

This one can’t really be answered in one Bible verse, but you should see the obvious:

Sirach 25:19  All wickedness is but little to the wickedness of a woman: let the portion of a sinner fall upon her.

There are also historical discrepancies between the Bible and the Apocrypha. Such as:

Judith 1:7  Then Nabuchodonosor king of the Assyrians sent unto all that dwelt in Persia, and to all that dwelt westward, and to those that dwelt in Cilicia, and Damascus, and Libanus, and Antilibanus, and to all that dwelt upon the sea coast,

2 Kings 24:1  During Jehoiakim’s reign, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon invaded the land, and Jehoiakim became his vassal for three years. But then he changed his mind and rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar.
It should be obvious that there is no way that we could place the Apocrypha on the same level as divinely inspired inerrant Scripture.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

The Woman in Revelation 17 that is the Vatican and how powerful she is.

St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, The residence of the Pope and the largest Catholic church in the world.

SOURCE: http://www.pinoyexchange.com/forums/showpost.php?p=56047214&postcount=37

These are the source links of this expose:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,839846,00.html

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1005234.htm

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- If there's one clear conclusion that can be drawn from the Vatican-related WikiLeaks disclosures, it's that the United States takes the Vatican and its diplomatic activity very seriously.

"The Vatican is second only to the United States in the number of countries with which it enjoys diplomatic relations (188 and 177, respectively), and there are Catholic priests, nuns and laypeople in every country on the planet. As a result, the Holy See is interested and well-informed about developments all over the globe," it said.

the revelation is clear and true let me requote it

Revelation 17:1-3 “…Come hither; I will show unto you the judgment of the great w h o r e that sitteth upon many waters: 2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed FORNICATION, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her FORNICATION. 3 …I saw a WOMAN sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy… 5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON the great, the MOTHER OF HARLOTS and abominations of the earth.”

Revelation 17:6 .....'And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.'

So Babylon the Great is drunk with the blood of Christians. Does this describe the Roman Catholic Church? Yes! No other institution has blood on their hands like the Roman Catholic Church does. Tens of millions of Christians were slaughtered during the reign of the church between 538AD - 1798AD.

Revelation 17:15 .....'he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the ***** sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.'

Babylon the Great sits upon many waters, which are people, nations and tongues. This describes the Roman Catholic Church, as she certainly sits upon (is supported by) many people and nations. The Roman Catholic Church has huge support all over the world. The support is so large that it equals to approximately 15% of the world population.

Revelation 17:18 .....'And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.'

again a GREAT CITY very obvious

this is not just a warning indeed God has an invitation to all of us who are chosen before the world began

Revelation 18:4 .....'Come out of her my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.'

ADDITIONAL EXPOSE:

From: http://www.pinoyexchange.com/forums/showpost.php?p=56000228&postcount=22

rich the revelation has something to say

Revelation 17:4 says she’s “decked with GOLD and PRECIOUS STONES and PEARLS, having a GOLDEN cup in her hand.”

Pahayag 17:4 (Ang Salita ng Diyos)

4Ang babae ay nakasuot ng ube at pulang mga damit. Siya ay nagayakan ng ginto at mamahaling mga bato at perlas. Siya ay may isang sarong ginto sa kaniyang kamay. Ito ay puno ng mga bagay na karumal-dumal at karumihan ng kaniyang pakikiapid.

The miter (mitra, mitre, infula) is the liturgical head-covering of the bishops, including the pope. It is not possible to prove its existence with certainty before the tenth century. The form has passed through many variations. At first it was a round cap fitting the head closely with a brow band and ribbons falling down on the back of the neck. The miter soon developed into a biretta with edges turned up sharply; it then received a tall peaked termination and finally assumed an oval form. An ornamental band, decorated in special cases with precious metals and stones, surrounds the lower rim, a second vertical one divides the breadth. The fabric is also embroidered with designs and figures. The material is silk; only at councils are linen miters prescribed for the bishops, in order to distinguish them from the cardinals

 Revelation 17:9


"This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits.

for ROME is proverbial as “the city built on seven hills. (click the image below to see it larger)

The Seven Hills of Rome:

Aventine Hill: This was the hill on which Remus chose to live.

Caelian Hill: Many of Rome's greastest lived upon here.

Capitoline Hill: The hill of the government. The temples of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, Juno Moneta, and Concord were built on this hill.

Esquiline Hill: Had a walled city built on it around 700 B.C.

Palentine Hill: The hill of Romulus, many of Rome's rich and elite lived here. The temple of Magna Mater was located here.

Quirinal Hill: The hill of which the Sabines nested.

Viminalis Hill: The smallest of the seven hills, and the last to be included in Rome.

In the bible woman represents the Church

Isaiah 54:5-6 “For your Maker is thine husband; the LORD of hosts is his name; and your Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called. 6 For the LORD has called you as a WOMAN forsaken and grieved in spirit, and a wife of youth, when you were refused, saith your God.”

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. 32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning CHRIST AND THE CHURCH.”

but the difference of this woman who sits on the seven hills is different from the true Church or the pure woman it is corrupted and a whore

Revelation 17:1-3 “…Come hither; I will show unto you the judgment of the great w h o r e that sitteth upon many waters: 2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed FORNICATION, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her FORNICATION. 3 …I saw a WOMAN sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy… 5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON the great, the MOTHER OF HARLOTS and abominations of the earth.”

sitteth upon many waters the revelation has something to say again

15And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the w h o r e sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

Revelation 17:18 .....'And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.

wow GREAT CITY now that's a very obvious CLUE

now that's powerful and UNIVERSAL

remember wisdom is needed to decypher who is this whore

now you know!

INC religion's TV program is asking Muslims to fight Eli Soriano for them

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

How to identify false brethen by a true brethen inside the God's Church Biblically

 

TOPIC: Is there a danger that can give to a true brethen?

1) Since the end of the world is near, they will be the source of danger - Read Matthew 24:8-10, 12-13

2) It can give danger to the Christian leader - Read 2 Corinthians 11:26

3) Proof of danger - Read Acts 20:28, 30

4) Be steadfast against false brethen and false workers - Read 2 Timothy 4:3-4, 2 Peter 2:13, Galatians 4:17

5) There are really false brethen - Read Galatians 2:4, Judas 1:4

A) What are the reasons to identify the true brethen in Christ from the false?

1) They corrupt the good manners of the good Christians - Read 1 Corinthians 15:33

2) So that the resources of doing righteousness should not be wasted - Read Galatians 6:16

3) They might influence so that it should really be avoided - Hebrews 12:15-16, 1 Corinthians 5:11-12

4) So that no real brethen in the Lord should be misled or influenced by them - Read 2 Thessalonians 2:2

5) So that we may be forwarned - Read Acts 20:28, Ecclesiastes 2:15-17 (part of taking care of the flock)

6) We must not be paranoid on the false brethens - Read Philippians 2:3-4

A real brethen in the Lord has spirit of discernment - (Read Malachi 3:18)

B) How to identify the false brethen who are still inside God's true Church?

1) Real Brethen in the Lord has spirit of unity with the Church - Read Romans 8:16

2) They have the same mind and same judgment (who are the majority in the Church, the false ones are not) - Read 1 Corinthians 1:10

3) It came from the Father of spirits - Read Hebrews 12:9

4) Which the false brethen have none of it - Read Judas 1:19

5) Real brethen in the Lord has one understanding - Job 32:8, Daniel 12:9-10

6) False brethen in the Lord have sprit of separating the true brethen - Read Galatians 4:17, 2 John 2:18-19

C) How to interact with the false brethen who are still not separated in the True God's Church?

1) Stay away from them - Read Romans 16:17

2) Dont even dine with them - Read 1 Corinthians 5:11-12

Unable to stay away from them will make your good character be corrupted by them (Read 1 Corinthians 15:33)

A WEIRD ISLAMIC TEACHING: Satan on a man's body? LOL

“Sahih” Al-Bukhari Volume 4. Hadith #516 - Narrated by Abu Huraira

The Prophet said, “If anyone of you rouses from sleep and performs the ablution, he should wash his nose by putting water in it and then blowing it out thrice, because Satan has stayed in the upper part of his nose all the night.”

Narrated 'Abdullah: It was mentioned before the Prophet that there was a man who slept the night till morning (after sunrise). The Prophet said, "He is a man in whose ears (or ear) Satan had urinated."

Volume 4, Book 54, Number 492:

Prophet Mohammad's false prophecies

 This is the drawing of some men when depicting DEATH

Allamah Hilli relates in some of his books that Prophet Muhammad (S) once passed by a Jew who was going to chop some wood. On seeing him, PROPHET MUHAMMAD (S) SAID THAT THE JEW WOULD BE BITTEN BY A POISONOUS SNAKE AND DIE

In the evening the companions saw the Jew and found it strange that he was still alive contrary to what Prophet Muhammad (S) had predicted. So they questioned Prophet Muhammad (S) about his predictions. Prophet Muhammad (S) asked for the Jew to be presented to him so that he could be questioned.

When the Jew came, Prophet Muhammad (S) asked him to open the bundle of chopped wood, and out popped a snake. Prophet Muhammad (S) asked the Jew what act he had done on that day.

In reply the Jew answered that he had not done anything in particular except that as he was eating some food a beggar asked him for some of it, so he gave one of the two cakes he had without any hesitation to the beggar.

Prophet Muhammad (S) then said that the Jew had been destined to die but for the charity he had given which removes seventy evils. The Jew accepted Islam.

Indeed charity increases your good deeds and your life.

MY COMMENT: THIS PROVES THAT PROPHET MOHAMMAD WAS NEVER SENT BY GOD AS A PROPHET. THEREFORE, HE IS JUST PRETENDING AND CLAIMING TO BE GOD SENT PROPHET

On the story, Mohammad predicted that a Jew will die but it did not happen. instead, he made an alibi to justify why it did not happen.

In the Bible, The a real prophet of God says that you will die is really you will die like you can read in the following verses:

Jeremiah 28:15 Then said the prophet Jeremiah unto Hananiah the prophet, Hear now, Hananiah; The LORD hath not sent thee; but thou makest this people to trust in a lie.

Jeremiah 28:16 Therefore thus saith the LORD; Behold, I will cast thee from off the face of the earth: this year thou shalt die, because thou hast taught rebellion against the LORD. 

Jeremiah 28:17 So Hananiah the prophet died the same year in the seventh month. 

2 Kings 1:16 Therefore thou shalt not come down off that bed on which thou art gone up, but shalt surely die.  

2 Kings 1:17 So he died according to the word of the LORD which Elijah had spoken.

We must remember that a word of the prophet of God is God's word written that is written now in the Torah which the Muslims also recognized as God inspired Scriptures too:

Deuteronomy 18:18 And will put my words in his mouth; 

So if Prophet Mohammad said that a Jew will die but it did not happen, this is one of the greatest proof that he is a false prophet and he was not sent by God to preach His Words.

If Prophet Mohammad's words are inspired by God, the Jew from the start should die and did not make any alibi why he was not killed by a snake bite. (Read again from above the Bible verses where both Prophet Elijah and Prophet Jeremiah said to a man that he will die and really they die afterwards)

If you want to see more of Prophet Mohammad's false prophecies, go to this site: CLICK HERE