Click this video and watch
The blogspot xposing all religious deceptions and iniquities in the world.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
INC religion's TV program clearly murder intent against their arch enemy preacher
INC religion's blatant lying to destroy the name of their own arch nemesis
Just Click the 2 videos to see the difference:
1) Bro. Eli is asking for 6 trillion pesos from his members
This is the adulterated version:
This is the original version:
2) About Bro. Eli is the hope of the country if he will be the president
This is the adulterated version:
This is the original version:
3) About Bro. Eli said that it is better to be infatuated to the same sex
This is the adulterated version:
This is the original version:
Prophet Mohammad is a gay pedophile too
"The Sayings of the Syrians," Chapter Title: "Hadith of Mu?awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan,"
Narrated by Hisham Ibn Kasim, narrated by Huraiz, narrated by Abdul Rahman Ibn Abu Awf Al Jarashy,
and narrated by Muawiya who said,
"I saw the prophet (pbuh) sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the prayers of Allah be upon him . For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire).
Proof that this Hadith is authentic:
http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/imam-jailed-for-immoral-acts-on-little-boys/
ADD religion supported Senator Manny Villar
This is the proof below. click the photo to in order to see it larger and clearer and other photos too.
Mr. pjd said that "hindi dahil sa pera o kapangyarihan kundi si Sen. Manny Villar ang kaisa-isahang presidential candidate na naglakas-loob na personal na humingi ng suporta sa pangasiwaan ng ADD, hindi kami ang lumapit kundi siya mismo... kaya kahit hindi talaga kami nag-eendorso, at maayos namang kausap ang senador, idinaan nalang ni Bro.Eli sa "bulong"... walang masama dun...
In English: Not because of money or power but it is Senator Manny Villar who is the only one presidential candidate had the courage to ask in personal on ADD authorities to get support. We (ADD) are not the ones who approached but he himself. even we do not really endorse and the we know senator speaks properly, Bro. Eli paved it to "WHISPER" There is nothing wrong.
FYI, Mr. pjd is not an ordinary ADD member. he is one of the members who had close links to Bro. Eli and to the high ranking ADD officials like their beloved Ministers in Charge, Ms. Luzviminda Cruz etc.
Since it is written in Filipino Tagalog, I will translate this in English:
Willy Santiago said that he was a 19 year ADD member and a close assistant of Bro. Eli. he even said that he is with Bro. Eli during debate, inside the car, thanksgiving, and he ate with him on a lunch.
In English: he said to Willy Santiago that he does not know he is with him w/o his knowledge.
The purpose of writing this topic is to prove w/o reasonable doubt that this is true because some ADD members in attempt to get more converts is they denied this thing that Bro. Eli supported a corrupt candidate in the eyes of the Filipino masses who was involved in C5 Road Construction, land grabbing and a secret presidential candidate during the last presidential elections of May 2010 of former Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo who was the most notorious president of the Philippines for almost of Filipino people which Bro. Eli himself believed too that this president favored very much his arch enemy the INC religion established in 1914 by Felix Y. Manalo and she is unjust on the part of Bro. Eli. Bro. Eli too believed that during ex President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's presidency is that the president herself too part in persecuting the ADD religion.
For some people who are being now converted by some Sorianist people aka ADD members and if they are anti Manny Villar. you should think it many times if you will subdue yourself to a religious leader who is a supporter of corrupt politician.
It is better for them to know this earlier than you will know this when you are already an ADD member and worse is you will get out of ADD religion after learning this hurtful truth.
ADDITIONAL PIECES OF EVIDENCE (UPDATE)
This is what Mr. pjd said (a Sorianist aka ADD member and an ADD forumer)
Mr. pjd said that "hindi dahil sa pera o kapangyarihan kundi si Sen. Manny Villar ang kaisa-isahang presidential candidate na naglakas-loob na personal na humingi ng suporta sa pangasiwaan ng ADD, hindi kami ang lumapit kundi siya mismo... kaya kahit hindi talaga kami nag-eendorso, at maayos namang kausap ang senador, idinaan nalang ni Bro.Eli sa "bulong"... walang masama dun...
In English: Not because of money or power but it is Senator Manny Villar who is the only one presidential candidate had the courage to ask in personal on ADD authorities to get support. We (ADD) are not the ones who approached but he himself. even we do not really endorse and the we know senator speaks properly, Bro. Eli paved it to "WHISPER" There is nothing wrong.
FYI, Mr. pjd is not an ordinary ADD member. he is one of the members who had close links to Bro. Eli and to the high ranking ADD officials like their beloved Ministers in Charge, Ms. Luzviminda Cruz etc.
Notice this:
Since it is written in Filipino Tagalog, I will translate this in English:
Willy Santiago said that he was a 19 year ADD member and a close assistant of Bro. Eli. he even said that he is with Bro. Eli during debate, inside the car, thanksgiving, and he ate with him on a lunch.
Notice pjd's reply:
In English: he said to Willy Santiago that he does not know he is with him w/o his knowledge.
The purpose of writing this topic is to prove w/o reasonable doubt that this is true because some ADD members in attempt to get more converts is they denied this thing that Bro. Eli supported a corrupt candidate in the eyes of the Filipino masses who was involved in C5 Road Construction, land grabbing and a secret presidential candidate during the last presidential elections of May 2010 of former Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo who was the most notorious president of the Philippines for almost of Filipino people which Bro. Eli himself believed too that this president favored very much his arch enemy the INC religion established in 1914 by Felix Y. Manalo and she is unjust on the part of Bro. Eli. Bro. Eli too believed that during ex President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's presidency is that the president herself too part in persecuting the ADD religion.
For some people who are being now converted by some Sorianist people aka ADD members and if they are anti Manny Villar. you should think it many times if you will subdue yourself to a religious leader who is a supporter of corrupt politician.
It is better for them to know this earlier than you will know this when you are already an ADD member and worse is you will get out of ADD religion after learning this hurtful truth.
ADDITIONAL PIECES OF EVIDENCE (UPDATE)
Palace urges public to make stand on RH bill
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/04/25/11/palace-urges-public-make-stand-rh-bill
MANILA, Philippines – MalacaƱang on Monday urged the public to make a stand on reproductive health and responsible parenthood.
Deputy Presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte said everyone is free to state their position on the issue.
She issued the statement after the Iglesia ni Cristo, some Christian denominations, and even priests expressed their support for the reproductive health (RH) bill.
"Siguro ang maganda lang po dito is that we are encouraging individual thinking in the sense na we really all have to make, as individuals, the choice whether to support something or not,” Valte said.
“Iyun po iyung nagiging maganda dito na lahat po ng ating mga kababayan – because of the debate that is going on – naliliwanagan po sila kung ano po 'yung posisyon ng isa, ano po 'yung posisyon ng kabila at, of course, in a democracy, we are all free to make our own individual decisions," she added.
President Benigno Aquino III made public his stand on responsible parenthood last April 18.
In a post on the official website gov.ph, Aquino laid out a 5-point position on the issue.
The president said that he is against abortion.
“I am in favor of giving couples the right to choose how best to manage their families so that in the end, their welfare and that of their children are best served,” Aquino said.
“The State must respect each individual’s right to follow his or her conscience and religious convictions on matters and issues pertaining to the unity of the family and the sacredness of human life from conception to natural death,” he added.
“In a situation where couples, especially the poor and disadvantaged ones, are in no position to make an informed judgment, the State has the responsibility to so provide,” according to Aquino.
“In the range of options and information provided to couples, natural family planning and modern methods shall be presented as equally available,” he said. - Report from Willard Cheng, ABS-CBN News
MANILA, Philippines – MalacaƱang on Monday urged the public to make a stand on reproductive health and responsible parenthood.
Deputy Presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte said everyone is free to state their position on the issue.
She issued the statement after the Iglesia ni Cristo, some Christian denominations, and even priests expressed their support for the reproductive health (RH) bill.
"Siguro ang maganda lang po dito is that we are encouraging individual thinking in the sense na we really all have to make, as individuals, the choice whether to support something or not,” Valte said.
“Iyun po iyung nagiging maganda dito na lahat po ng ating mga kababayan – because of the debate that is going on – naliliwanagan po sila kung ano po 'yung posisyon ng isa, ano po 'yung posisyon ng kabila at, of course, in a democracy, we are all free to make our own individual decisions," she added.
President Benigno Aquino III made public his stand on responsible parenthood last April 18.
In a post on the official website gov.ph, Aquino laid out a 5-point position on the issue.
The president said that he is against abortion.
“I am in favor of giving couples the right to choose how best to manage their families so that in the end, their welfare and that of their children are best served,” Aquino said.
“The State must respect each individual’s right to follow his or her conscience and religious convictions on matters and issues pertaining to the unity of the family and the sacredness of human life from conception to natural death,” he added.
“In a situation where couples, especially the poor and disadvantaged ones, are in no position to make an informed judgment, the State has the responsibility to so provide,” according to Aquino.
“In the range of options and information provided to couples, natural family planning and modern methods shall be presented as equally available,” he said. - Report from Willard Cheng, ABS-CBN News
Anti-RH Bill Supporters Attack INC, Atheism and Islam
The online supporters pushing for the rejection of the much debated Reproductive Health-Responsible Parenthood Bill created series of graphic images calling the Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC) "Iglesia ni Satan" after the media release of their official support to the RH Bill pending second reading in Congress.
INC expressed their support through an official letter made October 12, 2010 and was sent to the office of Rep. Rogelio Espina, chair of the House Committee on Population and Family Relations during the height of the House Committee hearings for the RH Bill.
INC's statement, signed by its Executive Minister, Eduardo Manalo, was made public by Bishop Rodrigo Tano, Chair of the Interfaith Partnership for the Promotion of Responsible Parenthood during their weekly forum at the Diamond Hotel last April 18th.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Aquino to risk excommunication over responsible parenthood bill
MANILA, Philippines -- President Benigno Aquino III on Sunday said he is firm in his conviction to have the responsible parenthood bill passed despite threats from some sectors to have him excommunicated.
“My conviction is firm to have the responsible parenthood bill passed,” he said in his speech during the 100th general commencement exercises of the University of the Philippines in Diliman, Quezon City.
“I am aware there are sectors opposed to this. But I have an obligation as a leader to dialog with all sectors and to calmly explain our position to them, even if some have been calling for my excommunication.”
“We have to listen to all people even if a lot have observed that their minds are already closed. But in the end, I have to decide. I have to follow my own conscience and I have to do what is right,” the President added.
The Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines last month resumed its dialog with the Palace on the responsible parenthood bill since Church leaders unilaterally withdrew from the meeting on Feb. 20.
The responsible parenthood bill is widely seen as a watered down version of the reproductive health bill.
At the House of Representatives, authors of the reproductive health bill have agreed to amend several provisions of the measure’s consolidated version, including the introduction of a paragraph in the bill making sex education optional.
House Minority Floor Leader Edcel Lagman, one of the proponents of House Bill 4244 or the consolidated RH bill, said he and his co-authors have agreed to give parents the option whether or not their children will attend sex education classes.
The amendment will be added to Section 16 of the consolidated version of the bill when the House resumes sessions after its Lenten break.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
The explanation about the evil spirit from the LORD
David Plays the Harp for Saul, by Rembrandt van Rijn, c. 1658.
Again, this is one of the most favorite verse of the Muslims to prove that the Biblical God is like a devil who sends evil spirit mentioned in 1 Samuel 16:14-15.
1 Samuel 16:14 But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.
1 Samuel 16:15 And Saul's servants said unto him, Behold now, an evil spirit from God troubleth thee.
Some of the most difficult passages in scripture are those that show God using the devil or evil spirits for His purpose. We know that God is not the cause of wickedness, so it goes against our understanding to think of Him sending evil spirits hither and yon to do His bidding. Yet, we examine scripture and there they are. Let us see if we can make sense of this biblical teaching.
1. First, we must understand that God is not the source of wickedness. The "evil" He creates in Isaiah 45:7I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
See All... refers to bad things like earthquakes and floods, not to sin or wicked acts (this verse is covered in another question and answer). The Bible teaches that sin originates from the devil (1 John 3:8He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
See All...). He is also the father of the lie and was a murderer from the beginning (John 8:44Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
See All...). On the other hand, God cannot be tempted with evil or wicked acts and He does not tempt any man to commit these acts (James 1:13-14 [13] Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [14] But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
See All...). God is holy and all that springs forth from Him is pure and good.
2. Second, though God is not the source of wickedness, He often uses the wicked to perform His own purpose. Psalm 76:10Surely the wrath of man shall praise thee: the remainder of wrath shalt thou restrain.
See All... states, "Surely the wrath of man shall praise thee: the remainder of wrath shalt thou restrain." Here we learn that God will take man's wrath toward Him and turn it into praise. That wrath which is not to be turned into God's praise will be restrained.
But how can God use the devil and evil spirits to do His bidding? Perhaps a biblical study of the cause of death would help at this point. On one hand, God is clearly the cause of death. In Deuteronomy 32:39See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand.
See All..., He declares, "I kill, and I make alive." Hannah, in her prayer of praise, said, "The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up" (1 Samuel 2:6The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.
See All...). Exodus 12:23For the LORD will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when he seeth the blood upon the lintel, and on the two side posts, the LORD will pass over the door, and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you.
See All... tells us concerning the first Passover, "For the LORD will pass through to smite the Egyptians." Certainly, God is in charge of taking life.
However, on the other hand, Hebrews 2:14Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
See All... tells us that Christ came to die on the cross that He might "destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil." The next verse say that the devil holds the lost in bondage through the fear of death. But the problem is clear. If God is in charge of death, how can the devil have the power of death? The answer explains a lot about how God uses the world of the wicked to do His bidding.
The devil by nature is a murderer (John 8:44Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
See All...). His rebellion against God changed his character and has made him a force that naturally kills and destroys all that comes under his power. In Revelation 9:11And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.
See All..., he is called Abaddon and Apollyon. Both names mean Destroyer. Paul understands that someone may be delivered "unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh" (1 Corinthians 5:5To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.
See All...).
We see this principle in operation in Job. When God turns Job over to Satan the second time, He states, "Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life" (Job 2:6And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life.
See All...).
If God had allowed him to do so, Satan would have killed Job. Earlier in the story, God did allow Satan to kill the sons and daughters of Job (Job 1:18-19 [18] While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, Thy sons and thy daughters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother's house: [19] And, behold, there came a great wind from the wilderness, and smote the four corners of the house, and it fell upon the young men, and they are dead; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.
See All...). So, who killed the children of Job? You say, Satan. But even this is not so easy. After they were killed, Job said, "the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD" (Job 1:21And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.
See All...).
He gave God the credit for taking his children (also the cattle and other possessions). And, if we reflect on it, we can see that both are true. Satan killed Job's children but God was responsible for allowing them to be killed. He took them away.
So, what about the sending of evil spirits by the Lord? This may be more common in scripture than you think.
In Psalm 78:49He cast upon them the fierceness of his anger, wrath, and indignation, and trouble, by sending evil angels among them.
See All..., God judged Israel "by sending evil angels among them." In Judges 9:23Then God sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem; and the men of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech:
See All..., "God sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem." In 1 Kings 22:22And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And he said, Thou shalt persude him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so.
See All..., God sent a "lying spirit" in the mouth of the false prophets to send Ahab to his death. In the passage in question (1 Samuel 16:14-15 [14] But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him. [15] And Saul's servants said unto him, Behold now, an evil spirit from God troubleth thee.
See All...), God removed His Spirit from the disobedient Saul. This opened the door for an evil spirit to come and torment Saul. Though in this passage, it is only the servants of Saul that said the evil spirit was from the Lord, in other passages (1 Samuel 18:10And it came to pass on the morrow, that the evil spirit from God came upon Saul, and he prophesied in the midst of the house: and David played with his hand, as at other times: and there was a javelin in Saul's hand.
See All...; 1 Samuel 19:9And the evil spirit from the LORD was upon Saul, as he sat in his house with his javelin in his hand: and David played with his hand.
See All...), the text states that the evil spirit came from the Lord.
What we see in these passages follows a pattern. When God removes His protective hand, he often turns the person over to Satan for destruction or to an evil spirit for torment. The devil and the evil spirits do the work, but God has allowed them to do what come natural to them for His own purpose.
I know that some will have trouble with this concept, but it is thoroughly established in scripture. God does not commit wickedness, but He uses the wicked for His purpose. In the end, God will have His glory. How much better it is for us to submit to Him and obey Him willingly.
But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.
What is the meaning of 2 Corinthians 12:16 that the Christians were caught by Apostle Paul's guile?
An art depicting Apostle Saint Paul
This is the probably the most favorite Bible verse of anti Apostle Paul Muslims to prove that the Apostle Paul is a deceiver:
2 Corinthians 12:16 But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.
Readers of this blog must know the reason why it was said.
In verses 13-21 of the 2nd letter of Paul to the Corinthians Chapter 12, Paul was being doubted by the Corinthian Christians that he is just after on their money as his own source of income.
That is why Apostle Paul said this:
2 Corinthians 12:14 Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not yours, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children.
2 Corinthians 12:15 And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.
Have you noticed the verse 15 that is bolded? this is the proof that Apostle Paul is not really after the money of the Corinthian Christians but instead he will be like a parent to them who will spend for them.
In fact, Apostle Paul unlike most preachers today whose source of their living came from their members' contributions do some labor mentioned in Acts 18:3 as a tentmaker.
This is the greatest proof that Apostle Paul will never be a burden to the Christians by getting their money as his own source of income because he also works for his own to sustain himself.
Now I should answer the meaning of the verse being used by the Muslims against the beloved Apostle Paul to prove that he is a deceiver of how we Christians was caught by Apostle Paul's guile? (notice carefully the words I bolded and underlined in the verses)
1 Corinthians 9:18 What is my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel.
1 Corinthians 9:19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.
1 Corinthians 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1 Corinthians 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
1 Corinthians 9:22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.
1 Corinthians 9:23 And this I do for the gospel's sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.
Sex, Slavery, and the Pro-Life Movement
SOURCE: http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2011/04/02/sex-slavery-and-the-pro-life-movement/
With seven Bataan village councils issuing unlawful copycat ordinances of the infamous Ayala Alabang one, it is time to call a spade a spade. This is not about unborn children. This is not about the RH Bill. What we are seeing is a war of attrition against sex, fought one village at a time.
Recently, Congressman and pugilist Manny Pacquiao was quoted as saying that if his parents had used contraceptives, he wouldn’t be here. Many RH opponents like him and Manoling Morato seem to be under the impression that contraceptives are depriving human society of celebrities like Pacquiao. The fact is, the odds against anyone’s birth are astronomical. Having contraceptives in the equation is a drop in the ocean of prerequisites necessary for anyone existing. Your exact set of ancestors going all the way back to the first sexual organism had to meet in the exact set of circumstances that led to your being. The millions in the batch of sperms in which you developed had to lose to you. For men, by choosing not to be procreating right at this moment, the next Einstein is now being reabsorbed into the male genitourinary tract. For women, by not being pregnant right now, the next Shakespeare is now being thrown out on a used tampon. And this is not even the half of it. Successful conceptions prevent the birth of other potential Newtons and Joyces. And these lost geniuses go unnoticed because they don’t exist and probably never will. If you weren’t here to exist, someone else will be.
Contraceptives do not make it any less likely in any significant way that any specific person will be born. The failure to understand this simple fact is what makes anti-choice superstars like former Chief Justice Davide embarrass themselves by disgustingly decrying contraceptives as worse than the tsunami that drowned thousands in their houses and cars in Japan.
The unborn aren’t a set of prefabricated people you draw out from heaven and into a vagina. They’re hypothetical permutations outnumbering the stars in the sky. Pacquiao’s line of reasoning was not only fallacious, it was unfairly self-deprecating for him. He was arguing that the only reason he has achieved what he has as an athlete was because he was born. It is a shame for someone like him who’s worked his fists to the bone to fall prey to manipulative quacks using his fame to impose their frumpy puritanism on the nation’s free citizens.
This has always been about sex. They want to dictate how it can be done. They want to dictate when it can be done. This is what keeps them up at night in cold sweats: someone at that exact moment may be enjoying themselves in a way they do not approve of.
The true intentions of the pro-life movement are betrayed by their obsession about an issue as innocuous and as private as the intimate relations of their neighbors. It is not just that they are anti-choice and against women having the right to do what they want with their bodies. What the conservatives of the Holy Roman Catholic Church want is to regulate sex. This is why even condoms, a mere physical barrier between an ejaculating penis and the womb, have to be lumped with contraceptive drugs. This is why former public officials like Lito Atienza compose hateful tirades about how gay marriage will destroy the Filipino family. This is why the pro-life movement of the Roman Catholic Church has always been about situations that involve sex and not about ethnic cleansing in Rwanda or the sectarian violence in Egypt.
Those who fashion themselves as more sophisticated than the rank and file opponents of the bill may use supposedly secular distractions such as “population collapse” in an attempt to mask their religious motives, but why is the burden of propping up an obviously flawed economy on our descendants who never chose such a fate? Since when has it again been acceptable to treat people as commodities and before they’re even born? Since when has it been honorable to deprive people of the informed choice to decide whether or not they want to have children? RH opponents have to resort to such shameful and despotic economic arguments just to hide their prejudiced belief that sex must be controlled at all costs.
At this point, if those disagreeing with me are even still reading, I have to address the old canard that sex is a gift from God and that liberals are trampling on it with their sex positive attitudes and their promiscuous lifestyles. Even if we were to allow this absurd and flawed premise, since when has a gift meant that the giver has total control over the use of said gift? Apparently, God’s gifts to man include the not insignificant requirement of human enslavement. Thanks, but, no thanks.
“Pro-life” is a misnomer. It is marketing speak for the larger culture war the social conservative movement is waging. It is a ruse to hide the desire at the core of the anti-choice anti-sex movement to become serfs ruled in absolute tyranny by an invisible thought police. In a bout of resentment against the freemen who reject such nonsense, conservative Catholics twist the arm of the national government to appease their sexual neuroses.
With seven Bataan village councils issuing unlawful copycat ordinances of the infamous Ayala Alabang one, it is time to call a spade a spade. This is not about unborn children. This is not about the RH Bill. What we are seeing is a war of attrition against sex, fought one village at a time.
Recently, Congressman and pugilist Manny Pacquiao was quoted as saying that if his parents had used contraceptives, he wouldn’t be here. Many RH opponents like him and Manoling Morato seem to be under the impression that contraceptives are depriving human society of celebrities like Pacquiao. The fact is, the odds against anyone’s birth are astronomical. Having contraceptives in the equation is a drop in the ocean of prerequisites necessary for anyone existing. Your exact set of ancestors going all the way back to the first sexual organism had to meet in the exact set of circumstances that led to your being. The millions in the batch of sperms in which you developed had to lose to you. For men, by choosing not to be procreating right at this moment, the next Einstein is now being reabsorbed into the male genitourinary tract. For women, by not being pregnant right now, the next Shakespeare is now being thrown out on a used tampon. And this is not even the half of it. Successful conceptions prevent the birth of other potential Newtons and Joyces. And these lost geniuses go unnoticed because they don’t exist and probably never will. If you weren’t here to exist, someone else will be.
Contraceptives do not make it any less likely in any significant way that any specific person will be born. The failure to understand this simple fact is what makes anti-choice superstars like former Chief Justice Davide embarrass themselves by disgustingly decrying contraceptives as worse than the tsunami that drowned thousands in their houses and cars in Japan.
The unborn aren’t a set of prefabricated people you draw out from heaven and into a vagina. They’re hypothetical permutations outnumbering the stars in the sky. Pacquiao’s line of reasoning was not only fallacious, it was unfairly self-deprecating for him. He was arguing that the only reason he has achieved what he has as an athlete was because he was born. It is a shame for someone like him who’s worked his fists to the bone to fall prey to manipulative quacks using his fame to impose their frumpy puritanism on the nation’s free citizens.
This has always been about sex. They want to dictate how it can be done. They want to dictate when it can be done. This is what keeps them up at night in cold sweats: someone at that exact moment may be enjoying themselves in a way they do not approve of.
The true intentions of the pro-life movement are betrayed by their obsession about an issue as innocuous and as private as the intimate relations of their neighbors. It is not just that they are anti-choice and against women having the right to do what they want with their bodies. What the conservatives of the Holy Roman Catholic Church want is to regulate sex. This is why even condoms, a mere physical barrier between an ejaculating penis and the womb, have to be lumped with contraceptive drugs. This is why former public officials like Lito Atienza compose hateful tirades about how gay marriage will destroy the Filipino family. This is why the pro-life movement of the Roman Catholic Church has always been about situations that involve sex and not about ethnic cleansing in Rwanda or the sectarian violence in Egypt.
Those who fashion themselves as more sophisticated than the rank and file opponents of the bill may use supposedly secular distractions such as “population collapse” in an attempt to mask their religious motives, but why is the burden of propping up an obviously flawed economy on our descendants who never chose such a fate? Since when has it again been acceptable to treat people as commodities and before they’re even born? Since when has it been honorable to deprive people of the informed choice to decide whether or not they want to have children? RH opponents have to resort to such shameful and despotic economic arguments just to hide their prejudiced belief that sex must be controlled at all costs.
At this point, if those disagreeing with me are even still reading, I have to address the old canard that sex is a gift from God and that liberals are trampling on it with their sex positive attitudes and their promiscuous lifestyles. Even if we were to allow this absurd and flawed premise, since when has a gift meant that the giver has total control over the use of said gift? Apparently, God’s gifts to man include the not insignificant requirement of human enslavement. Thanks, but, no thanks.
“Pro-life” is a misnomer. It is marketing speak for the larger culture war the social conservative movement is waging. It is a ruse to hide the desire at the core of the anti-choice anti-sex movement to become serfs ruled in absolute tyranny by an invisible thought police. In a bout of resentment against the freemen who reject such nonsense, conservative Catholics twist the arm of the national government to appease their sexual neuroses.
Bro. Eli Soriano's rape case filed by Daniel Puto Veridiano was dismissed already before
CLICK THE IMAGES TO SEE IT LARGER.
The rape case was dismissed at San Fernando, Pampanga's Regional Trial Court. (pls. look at the date when it happened)
Few months later, It was revived by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hear the case again.
Reviving a case after few months is against the law. (click and look at the photos below to see it larger)
No wonder if the DOJ under the Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's government did that it is because the Arroyo Administration favors the ADD's long time mortal nemesis, the INC (Iglesia ni Cristo) religion founded by Felix Manalo in 1914.
because of Gloria's belief that the INC members by its unity voting is the reason why she won in the presidential elections on May 2004.
how could I ever say that? It is because the INC can even request and it was granted that to remove one of its members named Lope Jimenez from the list of suspects in the Ruby Rose Barrameda case.
Today Bro. Eli is not a fugitive anymore
AND THAT IS WHY HIS NAME IS NOT FOUND ANYMORE IN THE INTERPOL WANTED LIST DATABASE
The Islamic religion is not the religion of peace but really the Christianity
These are my proofs:
1) What does the Quran and the Bible teaches what to do to the apostates?
The Quran teaches:
They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): So take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of God (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks;- (4:89)
The Bible teaches:
1 Timothy 1:20 Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme. (for the renegade apostates)
1 Timothy 1:15 This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me; of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes.
1 Timothy 1:16 The Lord give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain:
2) What does the Quran and the Bible teaches in order for Christians and Muslims to cease their enemies' persecutions?
The Quran teaches:
And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression. (2:193)
The Bible teaches:
1 Peter 2:15 For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men:
3) What does the Quran and the Bible teaches about having relations with unbelievers?
The Quran teaches:
Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: (3:28)
The Bible teaches:
James 2:1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.
Proverbs 28:21 To have respect of persons is not good:
What is respect of persons mentioned here? It is discriminating people if you will read the following verses:
James 2:2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;
James 2:3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:
James 2:4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?
Friday, April 15, 2011
The Islamic god is an unmerciful god
The word Allah in Arabic
How could I say that? It is because that god does not love unbelievers or non Muslims as mentioned in the verses of the Quran:
Muhammad told his people that anyone who rejects his claim to be a prophet will go to Hell:
Surely those who disbelieve in Allah and His messengers and (those who) desire to make a distinction between Allah and His messengers and say: ‘We believe in some and disbelieve in others’, and desire to take a course between (this and) that. These it is that are truly unbelievers, and We have prepared for the unbelievers a disgraceful chastisement. And those who believe in Allah and His messengers and do not make a distinction between any of them-- Allah will grant them their rewards (4:150-152)
He does not love the unbelievers (30:45)
(As for) those who disbelieve, surely neither their wealth nor their children shall avail them in the least against Allah, and these it is who are the fuel of the fire (3:10 Shakir: "firewood of hell")
But the Christian God Lord Jesus Christ who will judge on the Judgment Day will save non Christians as long as they do good things. In fact these people dont really know that what they do good to other people is they had done it to the Lord.
Matthew 25:34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
25:36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
25:37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
25:38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
25:39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
These are the following proofs from the Christians' holy book the Bible that the Christian God also loves even the wicked.
Proverbs 11:31 Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth: much more the wicked and the sinner.
Matthew 5:45 Father which is in heaven: for he makes his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.
I as a Christian has no right to judge immediately a non Christian it is because:
1 Corinthians 5:12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
1 Corinthians 5:13 But them that are without God judgeth.
1 Corinthians 4:5 Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God.
The reason is God will have mercy to some people to those he wanted to including in the Day of Judgment.
Romans 9:15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
When is the day Lord Jesus died on the cross?
The belief of the Catholic Church that Jesus Christ died on Friday is unbiblical? why? because it is clear that Jesus himself said that:
Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
So Jesus Christ's body should be at the tomb within 3 days.
If Jesus died on Friday, he should be resurrected on Monday.
n the Bible, We must remember that Lord Jesus Christ resurrected before the sun rises on Sunday.
John 20:1 The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.
John 20:2 Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple, whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him.
So Jesus Christ resurrected before Saturday evening in Gregorian measure of time. How could I say that?
John 19:31The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.
First, the Jews want to bury the Lord's body before sunset which is the start of a new day in the Jewish measurement of time.
John 19:31The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.
So the first whole day should Jesus' body
should remain in the tomb is on Thursday in the Gregorian measure of
time and then Saturday is the third day should Jesus Christ's body
remain in the tomb.
Meaning Lord Jesus died on 3:00 in the
afternoon and buried in the afternoon before the sunsets on the day of
Wednesday so Jesus' prophecy according in Matthew 12:40 that his body
should remain the tomb for 3 days is accurately fulfilled here. (Pls. look below how it happened)
Wednesday daytime - not counted
Wednesday night time - 1st night
Thursday day time - 1st day
Thursday night time - 2nd night
Friday day time - 2nd day
Friday night time - 3rd night
Saturday day time - 3rd day.
If some will say that Lord Jesus died on Thursday, well let's count if it will be accurately correct according in Matthew 12:40:
Thursday day time - not counted
Thursday night time - 1st night
Friday day time - 1st day
Friday night time - 2nd night
Saturday day time - 2nd day
Saturday night time - 3rd night.
See, it is inaccurate. there is less
one day in the counting and clearly, Jesus stayed in the tomb for 2 day
times only and not 3 days according to Matthew 12:40
If some will say that Lord Jesus died on Friday, well let's count if it will be accurately correct according in Matthew 12:40:
If some will say that Lord Jesus died on Friday, well let's count if it will be accurately correct according in Matthew 12:40:
We must now answer the Catholic Church's
false teaching that the reason why it is Friday was the day our Lord
Jesus died it is because after that day is the Sabbath being mentioned
in this verse:
John 19:31The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.
We must remember that Jesus died on 3:00 PM in the Gregorian measure of time and 6:00 PM is the start of the new day in the Jewish measure of time.
This is where the Unholy Roman Catholic Church got its conclusion that the Sabbath mentioned in John 19:31 is Saturday so Jesus Christ died on Friday. This is wrong! That Sabbath was high o great. this is not ordinary Sabbath.
In the Bible, There are many Sabbaths where Jewish people should not do work on that day. so almost all people are wrong that they believe that the only Sabbath in the Bible is the weekly Saturday Sabbath.
Ezekiel 20:20 And hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God.
So the question is if the Sabbath in John 19:31 is not the ordinary Sabbath for short the weekly Sabbath of Saturday. WHAT IS THAT SABBATH THAT WAS HIGH?
We must remember that Lord Jesus was crucified on Passover.
John 18:39 But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?
So what is the Sabbath that was high or great in John 19:31 after the Passover which it always happen on the 14th day of the 1st Jewish month of Nisan (Leviticus 23:5)?
Leviticus 23:6 And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread.
Leviticus 23:7 In the first day ye shall have an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein.
So that Sabbath that was high or great mentioned in John 19:31 is the 1st day of the 7 days where Jews should eat unleavened bread. that great Sabbath always happen on the 15th month of the 1st Jewish month of Nisan.
Nazi and Islam are united against the Jews
Al-Husseini, Hitler's bestfriend. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem
Symbol of Islam and Nazi under the leadership of Al-Husseini
No wonder today, Anti Semite Muslims praise Hitler
"You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion...The Mohammedan religion too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"
Adolf Hitler - August 28, 1942
"Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism (Islam), that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so."
Adolf Hitler - August 28, 1942
"Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism (Islam), that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so."
Adolf Hitler - August 28, 1942
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Why does Islam hates both Jews and Christians?
Just click this link to watch the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk6VgFg-EK4
Annihilation of Jews was done in the name of Hitler of Germany.
Quran has a more powerful teaching, annihilate Jews in the name of God, Allah.
"Jews are our enemies, let's unite and destroy Israel."
Vatican Radio is Told to Pay Out Over Transmitter Cancer Risk
SOURCE: http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2011/03/17/vatican-radio-is-told-to-pay-out-over-transmitter-cancer-risk.aspx
Vatican Radio is Told to Pay Out Over Transmitter Cancer Risk
The Supreme Court of Italy has ordered Vatican Radio to compensate Cesano, a small town near Rome, following allegations the broadcaster's high-powered transmitters put children at a higher risk of cancer.
Reports emerged in 2001 that electromagnetic radiation produced by Vatican Radio's transmitters near the town was above the legal limit. A health authority released a study claiming that children in the area were six times more likely to develop leukemia.
The 300-page report prepared by Italy's most prestigious cancer research hospital called the connection between Vatican antennas and childhood cancer "coherent and significant."
The Independent reports:
"Vatican Radio said it was disappointed by the ruling."
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
A Muslim who is related to Maguindanao Governor Toto Mangundadatu said that any wish will be granted if you're in heaven
Notice the words being underlined in red. (Click the image above to enlarge to see it clearer)
It means that this Islamic god is also similar to the genie LOL
So it is not bad to say that you can even ask Allah to permit you to marry and have sex to all beautiful women who are in the heaven.
Same also to homosexual Muslims that they can ask Allah to have sex as many males they want.
This is the one of the funniest thing I learned in Islamic faith LOL
Saturday, April 2, 2011
The Catholic Church is almost like the continuation of the Roman Empire spiritually
This is the St. Peter's Basilica where the Roman Pontiff resides
The answer is Yes!
The Roman Empire's religion
1. The chief Roman priest, head of the state religion, was known as the pontifex maximus;
2. The earliest Roman gods were the sky god Jupiter, the war god Mars, and Quirinus; other important early gods were Janus and Vesta. Many other deities were borrowed from Greek religion or associated with Greek gods, and the stories woven into Roman mythology were often taken directly from Greek mythology. Domestic shrines were devoted to divine ancestors or protectors, the Lares and Penates.
3. Dead Roman emperors were also raised to the status of divinities and were regarded with veneration and gratitude.
4. as a desperate attempt at novelty when appeals to the usual deities seemed stale, was the introduction of the Great Mother of Asia Minor, Cybele (204 bc).
Roman religion. (2011). In EncyclopƦdia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...Roman-religion
The Roman Catholic church
1. The chief Roman priest, head of the state religion, was known as the Pontiff(pontifex maximus)
2. The trinity, three gods in one
3. Dead men and women were also raised to the status of "saints" (divinities) and were regarded with veneration and gratitude.
4. "Virgin Mary", the MOTHER of God
Osama Bin Laden is the mastermind of September 11, 2001 attacks in New York
http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/12/13/tape.transcript/
Transcript of Osama bin Laden videotape
UBL: (...Inaudible...) we calculated in advance the number of casualties from the enemy, who would be killed based on the position of the tower. We calculated that the floors that would be hit would be three or four floors. I was the most optimistic of them all. (...Inaudible...) due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only. This is all that we had hoped for.
Shaykh: Allah be praised.
UBL: We were at (...inaudible...)
UBL - Usama Bin Laden
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)