OTHER DISMISSED CASES OF BRO ELI SORIANO

Manila, Philippines (5/2/2014) – In two cases filed separately on two related incidents by members of the Iglesia ni Cristo against Eliseo Soriano, the evangelist won his second round of court case. The first case filed in Marikina City was for attempted murder and spoke of an incident on September 4, 2001; the second filed in San Mateo, Rizal was for libel and zeroed in on an incident, three days after.

Soriano, who is referred to as Bro. Eli by his constituents, is the Presiding Minister of the Members Church of God International (MCGI) or Ang Dating Daan as known by the public for its flagship radio-TV program. The evangelist is now based overseas in accordance with his antipodal direction of preaching.

In an eight-page decision penned by Josephine Zarate Fernandez, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Fourth Judicial Region, Branch 76 of San Mateo Rizal, TV Broadcaster Eliseo F. Soriano was acquitted of the charge of libel. The order signed on January 14, 2014 said that malice was not proven beyond reasonable doubt.

According to Law, malice is one of the four elements of libel that must be sufficiently satisfied for the case to succeed. The three others include: the allegation of a discreditable act or condition concerning another, publication of the charge, identity of the person defamed, and existence of malice. The absence of anyone of these elements will not make the case prosper.

The case docketed as Criminal Case No. 5957 charged Soriano for the crime of libel as punished under Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code.  The complaint in part said that on the 7^th day of September 2001, the evangelist, during his TV program in SBN21 located at Pasig city,  uttered in particular, “Sabi nila sa akin, baka quack doctor yon, kaya galit sa akin (They told me, she may be a quack doctor and that is why she is mad at me.” Subject statement referred to Dr. Nancy Nakpil Pascua, the private complainant of the case, the decision said.

On September 4, 2001 or some three days immediately before the TV program wherein Soriano allegedly uttered that statement, Pascua happened to be found with some Iglesia ni Cristo members in the house of Dr. Alberto Jimenez and his wife who belonged to the congregation of the Ang Dating Daan. With them was Bernardo Santiago, one excommunicated by Soriano for adultery and then became a member of the Iglesia ni Cristo. As alleged by Witness Rolando Ocampo, this Bernardo Santiago, a companion of private complainant Dr. Pascua, told the Jimenez couple that Soriano is “bakla,” among others.

The decision ended, saying the degree of proof mandatory to establish malice was not attained. Soriano was therefore acquitted by the court.
Incidentally, in a separate case dismissed four years earlier, Bernardo Santiago of the Iglesia ni Cristo had filed a case of attempted murder against Bro. Eli Soriano and his companions. Docketed as Criminal Cases Nos. 2002-4236-MK and referring to September 4, 2001, the same date he and Dr. Pascua were visiting the Jimenez couple, private complainant Bernardo Santiago alleged that accused Soriano acted in conspiracy with the others to kill him.

According to the order dismissing the case, the prosecution presented Witnesses Glen Fernandez and Rommel Elbambuena who both heard one of the accused say, “Patayin yan! Patayin yan! Utos ni Ingkong!” (Kill him! Kill him! Order of Ingkong!) Ingkong is a monicker for Bro. Eli Soriano.

Judge Geraldine Fiel-Macaraig of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 192 of Marikina City, however, dismissed the case for insufficiency of evidence on February 11, 2010. Conspiracy was not proven.
The most recent case won by Bro. Eli and filed by Iglesia ni Cristo members was for libel but was dismissed on February 11, 2014. Ramil T. Parba as representative of the Iglesia ni Cristo along with Marianito Cayao and Bernardo Santiago, accused Eliseo Soriano and his companions, Danilo Navales, Jocel Mallari, Wilfredo Santiago and Luzviminda Cruz, of libel in Criminal Case No. Q-05-136679 for a program aired on January 21, 2005.

Soriano and his co-hosts in UNTV, after denying the allegation of the Iglesia ni Cristo that they were selling goods inside four church locales, were discussing the Supreme Court decision in People vs. Abella, G.R. No.127803, August 28, 2000 http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/aug2000/127803.htm

In a 15-page decision signed by Judge Jose G. Paneda of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 220 of the National Capital Judicial Region of Quezon City, Bro. Eliseo Soriano and his co-hosts at UNTV37 were acquitted of the crime of libel even when they were calling the chapel of the Iglesia ni Cristo, “killing fields” and “katayan.”

Comments are considered privileged communication when the subject in question is a public figure whose calling gives the public a legitimate interest in its doings, the decision said.
Cayao and Santiago incidentally are excommunicated members of Ang Dating Daan. In all of these three cases, Bernardo Santiago figured as either as private complainant or involved.

Bro. Eli Soriano wins Case Vs. Iglesia ni Cristo: “Killing Fields” and “Katayan” Comment not Libelous

Manila, Philippines (3/8/2014) – The court is not at all convinced that there exists a case for libel when making remarks from the reading of a Supreme Court Decision over a crime committed on a public figure’s grounds.

In a 15-page decision signed by Judge Jose G. Paneda of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 220 of the National Capital Judicial Region of Quezon City, Bro. Eliseo Soriano and his co-hosts at UNTV37 were acquitted of the crime of libel even when they were calling the chapel of the Iglesia ni Cristo, “killing fields” and “katayan.”

An earlier Criminal Case Nos. 2002-4236-MK for attempted murder accusing Eliseo Soriano et al. was also dismissed by Judge Geraldine C. Fiel-Macaraig of the National Capital Judicial Region, Branch 192 of Marikina City for insufficiency of evidence. This was signed four years earlier on February 11, 2010. The private complainant was Bernardo Santiago, one of the complainants in this recent dismissed libel case.
Comments are considered privileged communication when the subject in question is a public figure whose calling gives the public a legitimate interest in its doings, the decision said.

The decision signed on February 11, 2014 by Judge Paneda, said there is no finding as to the liability of the accused and as to the existence of the crime of libel for failure of the prosecution to prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the court said.

Ramil T. Parba as representative of the Iglesia ni Cristo along with Marianito Cayao and Bernardo Santiago, accused Eliseo Soriano, Danilo Navales, Jocel Mallari, Wilfredo Santiago and Luzviminda Cruz, of libel in Criminal Case No. Q-05-136679 for a program aired on January 21, 2005.

The hosts of “Itanong mo kay Soriano” program at UNTV were accused of “conspiring together, confederating with and mutually helping one another with evident intent of exposing the Iglesia ni Cristo to public dishonor, discredit, contempt, and ridicule” and imputing crime on the complainants.
The court noted that the programs, Ang Dating Daan of Bro. Eli and Ang Tamang Daan of the Iglesia ni Cristo have a history of exchanging verbal tussles. And the latest was of the INC complainants making a false expose of allowing selling merchandise inside the four churches of Soriano.

Soriano and his co-hosts in UNTV denied in their program the allegation and said the selling was being done outside of the worship areas. The topic for the day turned into which is more disrespectful: selling outside the church or killing in the basement of the chapel. They then discussed the Supreme Court decision in People vs. Abella, G.R. No.127803, August 28, 2000.

In part, the court decision said –
“The scene of the crime was within the compounds of the Iglesia ni Cristo in Sta. Ana and the basement thereof had been witness to the gruesome torture of victims who were eventually found floating in the murky rivers of Pasig.

“Private complainants took offense, more so hurt, when with the reading of the said case of Abella, accused depicted the House of Worship of the Iglesia ni Cristo as ‘katayan,’ the basement as killing fields, execution and torture, apparently in retaliation for the private complainant’s false expose.”

In sum, the court said the act of reading a Supreme Court decision is not libelous, and even with the comments and remarks of the accused, comments are considered privileged. The Case of People vs. Abella et al. where 5 PUP students were bludgeoned to death by INC members over a mere basketball game has since become a matter of public interest and therefore open to public scrutiny.

The court also took cognizance of the fact that the institution the complainants represented is a public figure wherein the public has legitimate interest in its doings.

Borrowing from the wisdom in Warren vs. Pulitzer Publishing Company, and also shared in Borjal vs. the Court of Appeals, the court said, “Every man has a right to discuss matters of interest. A clergyman with his flock, an admiral with his fleet, a general with his army, a judge with his jury. We are, all of us, the subject of public discussion….. It is only in despotism that one must speak sub rosa, or in whispers, with bated breath, around the corner, or in the dark on a subject touching the common welfare…”

The court also took note that when accused Eliseo Soriano peppered the members of the Iglesia ni Cristo with cases of libel in 2005 for calling him names like “Dayukdok,:  “Mandarambong, “Mongongotong, “Matakaw sa pera,” “Seaman-loloko,” among many other names through their program, Ang Tamang Daan, the cases were dismissed on the ground that they did not show any defamatory imputations and for lack of malice. The same was observed when the INC members distorted Soriano’s speeches and commentaries.
Documentary exhibits submitted by the defense consisted mostly of video tapes and DVDs to prove consistent patterns of mangling of tapes by the Iglesia ni Cristo on statements made by Soriano. An example was when Soriano was asking for 3.6 million on January 10, 2004; the mangled tape was shown in Ang Tamang Daan aired over Net 25 on March 29, 2004 that Soriano was asking for 6 trillion.

Incidentally, private complainants Bernardo Santiago and Marianito Cayao were excommunicated by Bro. Eli Soriano from Ang Dating Daan congregation, after which they joined the Iglesia ni Cristo.

Evangelist Eliseo Soriano is not a fugitive at his home country and on Interpol

Muslim leaders were not angry at Bro. Eli Soriano

They do not believe on INC 1914's lies by their mangled tapes of Bro. Eli Soriano claiming that he defamed the Islamic faith.

Bro. Eli is not a fugitive anymore

The picture of Bro. Eli Soriano

 

mismong gobyerno na nga ang maysabi na hindi fugitive si Bro.Eli, according to Presiding Judge Felixberto T. Olalia Jr., last December 15, 2009 pa... bakit? mas mataas ka na ba ngayon kesa sa gobyerno, mr.teng?

THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION FROM FILIPINO: The government itself said that Bro. Eli is not a fugitive. according to Presiding Judge Felixberto T. Olalia Jr., last December 15, 2009. why? are you higher now than the government, Mr. Teng.

This is a statement from an ADD forumer named pjd of the thebereans.net forum.

He is not an ordinary ADD member. he is one of the close associates of Bro. Eli who can see and mingle with his preacher in personal.

CLICK HERE FOR THE EVIDENCE

CA throws out suit filed by ABS-CBN vs Eli Soriano

SOURCE: http://www.tribuneonline.org/metro/20110409met3.html


By Benjamin B. Pulta
 
04/09/2011


The Court of Appeals (CA) has thrown out a suit for damages filed by the Lopez-controlled ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. against “Ang Dating Daan” television evangelist Eliseo “Eli” Soriano.
In an 11-page decision by Associate Justice Vicente Veloso, the CA Special 6th Division reversed and set aside the ruling of the Quezon City Regional Trial Court (RTC) against Soriano.

Associate Justices Francisco Acosta and Ramon Cruz both concurred with the decision.
The QC court ordered Soriano and the Bayan ng Katotohanan Inc. to pay P100,000 to defendants Patrick Paez, Epoy Fuduranan, Luchi Cruz-Valdes and Abigail Apostol, then officials of ABS-CBN news and current affairs.

The appellate court’s ruling pointed out that the lower court did not justify why Soriano and his religious group should be compelled to litigate and incur expenses to the defendants.

“Current jurisprudence instructs that in awarding attorney’s fees, the trial court must state the factual, legal or equitable justification for awarding the same, bearing in mind that the award of attorney’s fees is the exception, not the general rule, and it is not sound public policy to place a penalty on the right to litigate; nor should attorney’s fee be awarded every time a party wins a lawsuit,” the appellate court said.

The ruling added “while Article 2208 (of the Civil Code) allows attorney’s fees to be awarded the claimant is compelled to litigate with third persons or to incur expenses to protect his interest by reason of an unjustified act or omission of the party from whom it is sought, there must be a showing that the losing party acted willfully or in bad faith and practically compelled the claimant to litigate and incur litigation expenses.”

Soriano stated in his petition that he filed the case to protect their reputation and that they honestly believed that the filing of the case was the only legal way to prevent defendants from maligning their reputation.

The lower court earlier had stopped the airing of the Special Assignment, particularly the “Mga Kwentong Komiks ni Bro. Eli” episode.

ADD religion supported Senator Manny Villar

This is the proof below. click the photo to in order to see it larger and clearer and other photos too.

This is what Mr. pjd said (a Sorianist aka ADD member and an ADD forumer)

Mr. pjd said that "hindi dahil sa pera o kapangyarihan kundi si Sen. Manny Villar ang kaisa-isahang presidential candidate na naglakas-loob na personal na humingi ng suporta sa pangasiwaan ng ADD, hindi kami ang lumapit kundi siya mismo... kaya kahit hindi talaga kami nag-eendorso, at maayos namang kausap ang senador, idinaan nalang ni Bro.Eli sa "bulong"... walang masama dun...

In English: Not because of money or power but it is Senator Manny Villar who is the only one presidential candidate had the courage to ask in personal on ADD authorities to get support. We (ADD) are not the ones who approached but he himself. even we do not really endorse and the we know senator speaks properly, Bro. Eli paved it to "WHISPER" There is nothing wrong.

FYI, Mr. pjd is not an ordinary ADD member. he is one of the members who had close links to Bro. Eli and to the high ranking ADD officials like their beloved Ministers in Charge, Ms. Luzviminda Cruz etc.

Notice this: 

Since it is written in Filipino Tagalog, I will translate this in English:

Willy Santiago said that he was a 19 year ADD member and a close assistant of Bro. Eli. he even said that he is with Bro. Eli during debate, inside the car, thanksgiving, and he ate with him on a lunch.

Notice pjd's reply:

In English: he said to Willy Santiago that he does not know he is with him w/o his knowledge.

The purpose of writing this topic is to prove w/o reasonable doubt that this is true because some ADD members in attempt to get more converts is they denied this thing that Bro. Eli supported a corrupt candidate in the eyes of the Filipino masses who was involved in C5 Road Construction, land grabbing and a secret presidential candidate during the last presidential elections of May 2010 of former Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo who was the most notorious president of the Philippines for almost of Filipino people which Bro. Eli himself believed too that this president favored very much his arch enemy the INC religion established in 1914 by Felix Y. Manalo and she is unjust on the part of Bro. Eli. Bro. Eli too believed that during ex President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's presidency is that the president herself too part in persecuting the ADD religion.

For some people who are being now converted by some Sorianist people aka ADD members and if they are anti Manny Villar. you should think it many times if you will subdue yourself to a religious leader who is a supporter of corrupt politician.

It is better for them to know this earlier than you will know this when you are already an ADD member and worse is you will get out of ADD religion after learning this hurtful truth.

ADDITIONAL PIECES OF EVIDENCE (UPDATE)

Bro. Eli Soriano's rape case filed by Daniel Puto Veridiano was dismissed already before

CLICK THE IMAGES TO SEE IT LARGER.

The rape case was dismissed at San Fernando, Pampanga's Regional Trial Court. (pls. look at the date when it happened)

Few months later, It was revived by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hear the case again.

Reviving a case after few months is against the law. (click and look at the photos below to see it larger)

No wonder if the DOJ under the Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's government did that it is because the Arroyo Administration favors the ADD's long time mortal nemesis, the INC (Iglesia ni Cristo) religion founded by Felix Manalo in 1914.

because of Gloria's belief that the INC members by its unity voting is the reason why she won in the presidential elections on May 2004.

how could I ever say that? It is because the INC can even request and it was granted that to remove one of its members named Lope Jimenez from the list of suspects in the Ruby Rose Barrameda case.

Click and read in this link: Iglesia ni Cristo and the Ruby Rose Barrameda murder case


Today Bro. Eli is not a fugitive anymore

AND THAT IS WHY HIS NAME IS NOT FOUND ANYMORE IN THE INTERPOL WANTED LIST DATABASE